| |
future of the United States. In recent years,
however, disaffected U.S. citizens entrusted with
classified information, including naval personnel,
have caused exceptionally grave damage to our
country. Several Navy officers and chief petty
officers, Navy and Marine Corps noncommis-
sioned officers, and civilians have willfully and
deliberately sold secrets to foreign governments
for personal financial gain. Since 1985, the so-
called
Year of the Spy, United States
counterintelligence has identified, prosecuted, and
convicted several active-duty and retired personnel
for espionage. These espionage activities have
included the following acts of betrayal:
Information sold to the Soviet Union by
a recent family network of spies provided the
Soviets with U.S. Navy communications and
antisubmarine operational tactics. Subsequently,
the Soviets arranged to obtain, through a foreign
manufacturer,
restricted-technology milling
equipment needed to develop more silent sub-
marine propellers. Consequently, Soviet sub-
marines have the technical capability to reduce
their noise under water, which makes them harder
to detect and locate.
A U.S. Navy ship discovered that over 100
classified documents were missing. It then
submitted a report to the Chief of Naval
Operations (CNO) concluding that the documents
were probably destroyed by accident without
being compromised. Copies of two of the
documents were later found among the 15 pounds
of classified material taken by a young sailor. The
sailor had planned to pass them to his father, a
Soviet spy for almost two decades. Father and son
were sent to prison.
A second class petty officer, with a security
clearance, telephoned the Soviet embassy in
Washington, D.C., and offered to sell classified
information for $1,500. Following his conviction,
he told a Navy counterintelligence official that he
did this for the money.
An active-duty chief petty officer took
classified information home as personal study
material. He was apprehended and charged with
possible espionage.
A Marine Corps deserter, living overseas
on the charity of others, told an elaboratebut
untruestory. He claimed he worked for a Soviet
KGB agent as a spy against the United States.
After his arrest, the marine admitted to the Naval
Investigative Service that he made up the entire
story because he enjoyed the glamour of being
considered a spy.
A Navy ensign was arrested after he mailed
a classified electronic warfare document and two
microfilm indices of key code words to a foreign
embassy in Washington, D.C. The embassy,
fortunately one from a friendly government,
turned the material over to U.S. authorities along
with the ensigns request for payment of $50,000.
Court testimony revealed that he wanted to sell
the material to raise money for his girl friend in
another foreign country.
A Marine Corps private first class who
deserted his guard post at a Marine weapons
compound turned up at the Soviet embassy in
Washington, D.C. The marine offered to sell
unspecified military information for $500 to
$1,000.
The United States loses thousands of pieces
of classified information each year, apparently
without a trace. A simple explanation may be that
too many people in the Navy and Marine Corps
do not follow instructions or that they ignore
regulations. Some of them maybe disloyal citizens
who pose a real or potential threat to the national
defense. Regardless of the reason or motivation,
they all make the foreign espionage agents job
easier. We may never know the full national
security significance of many of these losses
because we have not been effectively controlling
or accounting for all classified information. Each
member of the Navy must become a full partner
in the costly, but necessary, efforts to keep better
track of vital classified documents and equipment.
Only by all hands working together can we guard
our personal safety, protect the national security,
and ensure the future of the United States of
America.
NAVAL INTELLIGENCE
Intelligence, properly performed, can provide
a foreknowledge of important information for
both government and military leaders. It helps our
leaders reach sound decisions that are vital to the
security of a nation as well as to success in
combat. It can reduce the possibility of surprise,
evaluate enemy potential, and predict enemy areas
of operation.
13-10
|